sharonmadds

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Summary of Knox v. SEIU

My summary of Knox v. SEIU at SCOTUSblog.com: Knox knocks unions on mid-year assessment for non-members.

28 Day Free Trial

Custom Alerts

Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/06/summary_of_knox.html

bankruptcy lawyer bankruptcy lawyers

Posted by sharonmadds at 12:00 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2014 (1906)
    • ►  August (221)
    • ►  July (247)
    • ►  June (240)
    • ►  May (246)
    • ►  April (235)
    • ►  March (246)
    • ►  February (223)
    • ►  January (248)
  • ▼  2013 (2608)
    • ►  December (247)
    • ►  November (240)
    • ►  October (248)
    • ►  September (240)
    • ►  August (243)
    • ►  July (195)
    • ►  June (201)
    • ►  May (199)
    • ▼  April (226)
      • Judge Scheindlin’s Collection Case and Florida E-D...
      • Can You Get Jail Time For Watching A Cartoon?
      • Turning TECHSHOW Topics into a Technology Agenda
      • Social Media and Lawsuits
      • Virginia Tech families allowed appeal in shootings...
      • Ireland high court rules paralyzed woman has no ri...
      • Second Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Section 11 an...
      • Pit Bull Owners Bark at Background Check Bill
      • Paralegal Career Opportunities in Litigation Support
      • The Eureka Moment: How Big Law Has Learned to Love...
      • Absolute Novelty Worldwide - Not Always So Absolute
      • Lawyers' Duty to Know Technology?
      • The oldest person in the dugout? The bat boy (Flor...
      • THE PRACTICE: After Boston: Security Is Every Comp...
      • When Conscience Conflicts With Constituents
      • Children Hostage in the War on Pot
      • Pakistan court orders house-arrest for former pres...
      • After a Productive Two Years, Hank Morris Wins His...
      • The Legal Toolkit is Back
      • Mark Woods: Threats to a marriage? Here's one pers...
      • Good-Time Credit for Enemy Combatants? Court Says No
      • Incompetent Immigration Detainees Win Right to Cou...
      • Pakistan court orders house-arrest for former pres...
      • The Best Paralegal Law Technology Trends
      • Six Hats: Parallel Thinking for Paralegals
      • The Legal Trade Show Survival Guide
      • No district court jurisdiction for federal employe...
      • Mark Woods: Does Florida have inconsistent approac...
      • Egypt president affirms commitment to judicial system
      • Technology-Enhanced Television
      • Newsflash: McDonald's focuses on "value"
      • Jennifer Carroll's answer to the $72,000 question ...
      • Desktop as a Service for Lawyers
      • Find Now, Read Later
      • Global E-Discovery & Da Silva Moore Technology Ass...
      • Pit Bull Owners Bark at Background Check Bill
      • Pit Bull Owners Bark at Background Check Bill
      • EEOC can use Teamsters-style pattern-or-practice t...
      • California Supreme Court Resolves Court of Appeal ...
      • Federal Circuit Nominee Questioned on Patent Law
      • Accelerate Your Use of Metrics
      • Solos, Structured Settlements, & Medicare Set Asides
      • Which law schools are tops for jobs?
      • Gone Clio with Attorney Bruce Godfrey
      • Don't Ignore Governmental Mechanisms for Protectin...
      • The ‘Public Safety’ Exception
      • Mark Woods: ‘We don’t run away; we run’ (Florida T...
      • Ethical Obligations within E-Discovery
      • Language is Everything
      • Vet’s court a success and should continue, report ...
      • Mark Woods: And once again, news that rocks our se...
      • Legal Talk Network Live at LegalTechNY 2012- Clio ...
      • OPINION: An Important Win for Whistleblowers
      • Mark Woods: Spring training packs an economic and ...
      • The Law and the Liability of Eugenics
      • NLRB: Firing for Facebook posting was legal
      • Strength in Numbers
      • NSSTA’s Take the Hill
      • Legal Talk Network Live at LegalTechNY 2012-LexisN...
      • Key changes to Patent Law
      • Pakistan court places Musharraf under house arrest
      • 2011 Intellectual Property Year in Review and Outl...
      • 20 Legal Technology Tips in 20 minutes
      • Child’s Play: What E-Discovery Teams Can Learn fro...
      • File for FICA Tax Refunds Before April 15
      • Language is Everything
      • Gone Clio with Attorney Michael J. P. Schewe
      • Medicare Set-Aside Professional Administration
      • Affirmative action ban in state constitution viola...
      • Attending Law School After Serving in Marine Count...
      • Judge And Lawyer Argue Over "Tie." Who Wins?
      • Ouch! Lessons Learned from the Morgan Lewis’ Redac...
      • Summary of Knox v. SEIU
      • Dakota County judge discplined for comments
      • The "Pink Collar" Profession: The Male Paralegal's...
      • Paralegals and Microsoft Office Suite
      • Don't Ignore Governmental Mechanisms for Protectin...
      • Fresh Toyota Suit Features Panicked Call for Help
      • 2011 Intellectual Property Year in Review and Outl...
      • Exoneree Detectives Fight For Those Still Behind Bars
      • Turn Your Solo Practice into a Highly Utilized Bus...
      • Future OS: Windows 8, Apple Mountain Lion and Beyond
      • The U.S. Supreme Court’s Golan v. Holder Decision
      • Defense Attorneys Turning to Social Media
      • McDonnell accepting applications for judgeships
      • The Legal Crusade to Save Endangered Species
      • The Healthy Workplace Bill
      • Second Circuit dismisses 9/11 civil suits
      • Burn Injury Litigation
      • Legal Issues Surrounding the Colorado Movie Massacre
      • Living in a Public Beta
      • 20 Legal Technology Tips in 20 minutes
      • Mark Woods: One Spark is a chance for Stark to dre...
      • The Law and the Liability of Eugenics
      • Mark Woods: One Spark is a chance for Stark to dre...
      • Should Silence Convict
      • Language is Everything
      • Turn Your Solo Practice into a Highly Utilized Bus...
      • The AAPD in 2013 and the Fight for People with Dis...
      • Why Go with a Structured Settlement?
    • ►  March (194)
    • ►  February (198)
    • ►  January (177)
  • ►  2012 (826)
    • ►  December (144)
    • ►  November (232)
    • ►  October (240)
    • ►  September (209)
    • ►  March (1)

About Me

My photo
sharonmadds
View my complete profile
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.