Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202594007440&rss=rss_nlj
attorney definition attorney directory attorney fees attorney finder attorney law
Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202594007440&rss=rss_nlj
attorney definition attorney directory attorney fees attorney finder attorney law
Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202594008742&rss=rss_nlj
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2012/10/2012-legal-tech-surveys-say/
power attorney power of attorney power of attorny private attorney private lawyer
Come crunch time, I guess we all occasionally make the wrong decision. This would appear to be just such an occasion. As reported by The Naples Daily News:
When caught red handed with a pair of stolen $16 earrings, Naples police say a Golden Gate teen turned to drastic measures to get rid of the evidence — he drank them.How do you drink earrings?
Police say Colburn was caught shoplifting the glamorous $16 jewelry by JCPenney loss prevention officer Leonardo D. Gonzalez just after 1 p.m. on Saturday. Gonzalez watched as Colburn selected a pair of earrings from the jewelry department, took them out of the box and placed them into a bottle of vitamin water, police said.
Colburn then left the store without paying for the earrings, reports said.
Gonzalez confronted Colburn about the earrings, and began escorting him back to the JCPenney loss prevention office. It was then, police said, that Colburn gulped down the rest of the vitamin water, earrings and all.It's not looking good for Mr. Colburn, but it's still word against word, right? Nope.
When police arrived, Colburn was arrested and transported to NCH Downtown Naples Hospital for an X-ray. On the X-ray image, the earrings were observed inside Colburn, police said.Damn that contraption! To read more (a fair amount), and see the mug shot, click here.
Source: http://rss.justia.com/~r/LegalJuiceCom/~3/YxaXNOcgHsQ/post_630.html
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/gone-clio/2012/01/gone-clio-with-beate-weiss-krull/
employment lawyer employment lawyer san diego employment lawyers estate attorney family law
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2012/02/the-healthy-workplace-bill/
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/09/nsstas-leadership/
employment attorney employment law employment law courses employment lawyer employment lawyer san diego
divorce lawyers download power of attorney dui attorney dui lawyer dumb laws
Source: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/LawBizBlog/~3/j5cighbx6zg/
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/the-law-and-the-liability-of-eugenics/
free lawyer advice free lawyer consultation free lawyer consultation california free lawyers free legal advice
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/gambling-on-sports-and-the-law/
lawyer fees lawyer firm lawyer malpractice attorneys lawyer office lawyers
A look back at landmark cases makes clear that the Supreme Court never really knows exactly how its decisions will play out — especially not in the long run. That uncertainty must loom over the justices now as they contemplate the issue of gay marriage.
» E-Mail This » Add to Del.icio.us
best attorney business law business lawyer civil attorney colleges for lawyers
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/05/actos-litigation/
Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202593809896&rss=rss_nlj
traffic lawyer traffic ticket lawyer absolute power of attorney attorney attorney at law
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/lawyer2lawyer-7th-anniversary/
personal injury lawyers power attorney power of attorney power of attorny private attorney
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2012/04/law-firms-go-mobile/
commercial law common law company law conservator copyright lawyer
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/a-radical-or-rational-scotus-session/
employment lawyer san diego employment lawyers estate attorney family law family lawyer
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2012/07/find-now-read-later/
The three finalists to replace the retiring Justice Paul Anderson on the Minnesota Supreme Court were announced.
They are:
Judge Edward J. Cleary sits on the Minnesota Court of Appeals as judge for the Fourth Congressional District. He previously served as judge and Assistant Chief Judge for the Second Judicial District. From 1997-2002, Cleary served as the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility. Prior to that, he practiced law for 20 years, concentrating on criminal defense and civil litigation. He is a past president of the Ramsey County Bar Association and served on the Minnesota State Bar Association Governing Council. In addition, Cleary served as an adjunct professor at the University of Minnesota Law School from 2000-2012.
Judge Natalie E. Hudson sits on the Minnesota Court of Appeals as an at large judge. Prior to her appointment to the Minnesota Court of Appeals, she served as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Minnesota in the Criminal Appeals and Health Licensing Divisions. Hudson has also served as the City Attorney for the City of St. Paul, and was the Assistant Dean of Student Affairs at the Hamline University School of Law. She is a member of the American Bar Association’s Judicial Division and is a member of the Minnesota Women Lawyers Advisory Board.
David L. Lillehaug is a former United States Attorney for Minnesota. Lillehaug is an officer and shareholder with Fredrikson & Byron. His litigation practice focuses on public law and complex cases – civil, criminal, and administrative – with a particular emphasis on state and federal constitutional issues. He serves on three non-profit boards and on the Minnesota State Bar Association’s Mock Trial Program Advisory Committee.
Anderson is set to retire in May. No word on when his replacement will be named.
Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2013/03/12/3-candidates-named-to-replace-anderson-on-supremes/
Source: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/03/26/at-the-supreme-court-a-shadow-of-a-doubt/?mod=WSJBlog
corporate lawyer criminal attorney criminal defence lawyer criminal defense criminal defense attorney
Source: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/03/27/judges-question-use-of-cellphone-tracking-devices/?mod=WSJBlog
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2012/02/cryopreserved-embryos-in-divorce-cases/
legal aid eugene oregon legal aid society legal counsel legal help legal information
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/09/nsstas-leadership/
divorce atterney divorce attorney divorce lawers divorce lawyer divorce lawyers
The Kootenai County commissioners unanimously passed a resolution on Tuesday to end his term this fall.
"It's absolutely a termination," Adams said.
Adams said the termination notice comes three weeks after he made a formal complaint against Commissioner Jai Nelson, saying she had allegedly harassed him since she joined the board. The notice comes two weeks after Adams, 59, told Commission Chairman Todd Tondee that he has cancer and will be undergoing chemotherapy and will need a day off each week for the treatment. Facing the loss of his health insurance is scary, Adams said.
It will be personally devastating, given that he's suffering cancer. It will be institutionally worse, given that he ran an exceptionally effective office. Adams learned that "his services were no longer needed" in a one-line memo, which he called "shabby." That seems like a nice way to put it. Disgraceful seems more appropriate.
The official explanation for Adams' unceremonious termination is, as government's so love, a study.
"He may be reappointed," Nelson said Friday. "Periodic evaluation is something that's part of the commissioners' duty."Nelson said the commissioners are going to do a "comprehensive study" of the county's public defense system. Setting an expiration date for Adams' services is the first step in that process, she said.
After all, when something is working well, doesn't that demand a study? Particularly when the person announcing the study is the same person against whom a harassment complaint had been lodged a few weeks before. Of course, it could very well be accurate, that a study is needed to figure out why the public defender is doing so well. Government can't run an efficient criminal justice machine when the public defender keeps getting in the way.
And as day follows night, the excuses follow the explanation.
"They're just going to put somebody in there who they think they can control," Adams said. "These terms aren't meant to be indefinite," Nelson said. "People don't own these offices."Nelson said the county hopes to complete its study by this fall. At that time, it's unlikely the commissioners will choose to reappoint Adams.
It's true that political appointees don't "own" their offices, but people who do their job well, extremely well, are usually the ones that get to stay in them. In a rational world, anyway. But then, doing a job well is a matter of perspective. The staff in his office rated John Adams' job performance well, giving him 9 to 10 on a ten scale for his various administrative functions. Some just gave him 10 across the board. He was deeply admired by his people.
Nelson, the accused harasser, didn't think as well of him.
In a Sept. 30 report of Adams' job performance, Nelson wrote: "The relationship between you and the board has continued to deteriorate over the last year and there have been several instances where you have communicated with the board members in an angry, disrespectful and unprofessional manner."
She said he needed improvement in budgeting, "respectful communication," following "board directives," attendance, and "timely response in communicating issues and concerns with a concerted effort at internal resolution of conflicts."
She graded him a "6" in "job understanding" on a scale of one to 10. He got a "5" in job performance, "6" in productivity, "6" in dependability and efficiency, and "3" in cooperation. His overall score was "5," putting him in the "marginal" range, meaning his performance requires improvement and he needs more than normal supervision.
There is certainly a problem when a public defender, an appointee of a local political body made up of very important people, is accused of the inability to communicate with those very important people except in an "angry, disrespectful and unprofessional manner." Then again, when the public defender has been communicating just fine for the past 17 years, and the problem suddenly arises, maybe the very important people have the problem backwards.
Or maybe the complaints are about the wrong problem. John Adams was universally respected by the bench and bar, and his only detractors happened to sit on the board that thought he worked for them. As the public defender, he thought he worked for the men and women of Kootenai County he was appointed to serve. He did so with distinction, with honor, with zeal. He fought for their rights in court, and for the resources to serve them before the tightwads who couldn't imagine why they should squander money on poor criminals. Most of all, he didn't ask "how high" when directed to jump. That's downright insubordination.
The article in the Coeur d'Alene Press offers a lengthy list of people praising John Adams, as lawyer, as public defender, as an honorable man. Coming on the heels of Gideon's 50 birthday, when so many opined that the tide is turning, that people are coming to realize that innocent people get convicted and the public defense function may be the only thing that stands between them and a lifetime in prison for a crime they didn't commit, this offers a very different, very ominous message.
They ought to build a statue for John Adams in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. Instead, he's been hung out to dry, cancer and all, for doing his job too well. Believe in happy things all you want, but this is how fragile the defense of the accused can be, a one-line memo way from termination at the hands of a hater.
Source: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2013/03/24/firing-john-adams.aspx?ref=rss
1. Higher Thresholds For HSR Filings
Higher thresholds for premerger filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 became effective on February 11, 2013. The filing thresholds are revised annually, based on the change in gross national product.
The HSR Act notification requirements apply to transactions that satisfy the specified "size of transaction" and "size of person" thresholds. The key adjusted thresholds are summarized in the following chart:
Size of Transaction Test | Notification is required if the acquiring person will acquire and hold certain assets, voting securities, and/or interests in non-corporate entities valued at more than $70.9 million. |
Size of Person Test (Transactions valued at more than $283.6 million are not subject to the Size of Person Test and are therefore reportable) | Generally one "person" to the transaction must have at least $141.8 million in total assets or annual net sales, and the other must have at least $14.2 million in total assets or annual net sales. |
While the filing thresholds have changed, the filing fees have not, but will be based on the new thresholds as follows: $45,000 for transactions valued at more than $70.9 million but less than $141.8 million; $125,000 for transactions valued at more than $141.8 million but less than $709.1 million; and $280,000 for transactions valued at more than $709.1 million.
The above rules are general guidelines only and their application may vary depending on the particular transaction.
2. Higher Thresholds For the Prohibition Against Interlocking Directorates
Higher thresholds for the prohibition in Section 8 of the Clayton Act against interlocking directorates became effective on January 14, 2013. Section 8 prohibits, with certain exceptions, one person from serving as a director or officer of two competing corporations if two thresholds are met. Applying the new thresholds, competitor corporations are covered by Section 8 if each one has capital, surplus and undivided profits aggregating more than $28,883,000, with the exception that the interlock is not prohibited if the competitive sales of either corporation are less than $2,888,300. As with HSR thresholds, the FTC is required to revise Section 8 thresholds annually based on gross national product.
For any questions or for more information on these or any related matters, please contact Bob Magielnicki (202-218-0002, rmagielnicki@sheppardmullin.com) or Malika Levarlet (202-772-5331, mlevarlet@sheppardmullin.com).
Disclaimer
This update has been prepared by Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice, is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete and may or may not reflect the most current legal developments. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this update.
personal injury lawyer personal injury lawyers power attorney power of attorney power of attorny
Ed discusses alternative billing and how it relates to the elements of certainty and trust.
Source: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/LawBizBlog/~3/1CsB_keOFUI/
injury lawyer injury lawyers international law international law schools internet lawyer
This is pretty cool.
EEOC briefs are now on line. [Here]
They cover briefs filed in the US Circuit Courts of Appeals in which the EEOC was a party, plus amicus briefs filed in the US Circuit Courts of Appeals, District Courts, and state courts.
And there is a user-friendly search function.
Briefs filed in the US Supreme Court are not in this collection, and can be found through the US Solicitor General's collection [here].
Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/06/eeoc_briefs_on.html
legal services lemon law letter of attorney litigation attorney local attorney
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2012/03/sjc-ruling-on-foreclosures/
legal advice online legal aid legal aid eugene oregon legal aid society legal counsel
Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/03/north-dakota-legislature-passes-measure-outlawing-abortions.php
Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202593174039&rss=rss_nlj
divorce lawers divorce lawyer divorce lawyers download power of attorney dui attorney
1. Higher Thresholds For HSR Filings
Higher thresholds for premerger filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 became effective on February 11, 2013. The filing thresholds are revised annually, based on the change in gross national product.
The HSR Act notification requirements apply to transactions that satisfy the specified "size of transaction" and "size of person" thresholds. The key adjusted thresholds are summarized in the following chart:
Size of Transaction Test | Notification is required if the acquiring person will acquire and hold certain assets, voting securities, and/or interests in non-corporate entities valued at more than $70.9 million. |
Size of Person Test (Transactions valued at more than $283.6 million are not subject to the Size of Person Test and are therefore reportable) | Generally one "person" to the transaction must have at least $141.8 million in total assets or annual net sales, and the other must have at least $14.2 million in total assets or annual net sales. |
While the filing thresholds have changed, the filing fees have not, but will be based on the new thresholds as follows: $45,000 for transactions valued at more than $70.9 million but less than $141.8 million; $125,000 for transactions valued at more than $141.8 million but less than $709.1 million; and $280,000 for transactions valued at more than $709.1 million.
The above rules are general guidelines only and their application may vary depending on the particular transaction.
2. Higher Thresholds For the Prohibition Against Interlocking Directorates
Higher thresholds for the prohibition in Section 8 of the Clayton Act against interlocking directorates became effective on January 14, 2013. Section 8 prohibits, with certain exceptions, one person from serving as a director or officer of two competing corporations if two thresholds are met. Applying the new thresholds, competitor corporations are covered by Section 8 if each one has capital, surplus and undivided profits aggregating more than $28,883,000, with the exception that the interlock is not prohibited if the competitive sales of either corporation are less than $2,888,300. As with HSR thresholds, the FTC is required to revise Section 8 thresholds annually based on gross national product.
For any questions or for more information on these or any related matters, please contact Bob Magielnicki (202-218-0002, rmagielnicki@sheppardmullin.com) or Malika Levarlet (202-772-5331, mlevarlet@sheppardmullin.com).
Disclaimer
This update has been prepared by Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice, is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete and may or may not reflect the most current legal developments. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this update.
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2013/02/control-your-mobile-apps/
employment law employment law courses employment lawyer employment lawyer san diego employment lawyers
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2012/03/new-ipad-new-decisions/
There's more than one way to see things!
Source: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/LawBizBlog/~3/ay7qKuQiFOI/
real estate attorney real estate lawyer solicitor solicitors statute law
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2012/03/suplus/
free attorney consultation free lawyer free lawyer advice free lawyer consultation free lawyer consultation california
Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202592023918&rss=rss_nlj
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/boston-university-school-of-law/2012/04/shareholder-activism/
divorce lawers divorce lawyer divorce lawyers download power of attorney dui attorney
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/obamacare-on-trial/
An fresh investigation into the 1990 murder of a New York rabbi has resulted in the freedom of the man convicted of the crime. Prosecutors supported David Ranta's release, saying serious doubt had been cast on his guilt.
» E-Mail This » Add to Del.icio.us
traffic attorney traffic lawyer traffic ticket lawyer absolute power of attorney attorney
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/defending-a-serial-killer/
employment law courses employment lawyer employment lawyer san diego employment lawyers estate attorney
The United States Senate Judiciary Committee has moved the nomination of Jane Kelly to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. If confirmed by the full Senate, she will be the second woman to serve on the court. Kelly is a federal public defender who lives in Cedar Rapids.
Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2013/03/22/diversity-inching-toward-the-8th-circuit-bench/
district attorney divorce atterney divorce attorney divorce lawers divorce lawyer
Bryan Lake reports for the MSBA that The Coalition for Impartial Justice introduced HF1083/SF1082 last week. The bill, which is supported by the MSBA, offers a three-part reform of Minnesota’s judicial selection system, including public performance evaluations, mandatory merit selection, and retention elections. A bipartisan group of authors have signed the bill, led by chief authors Sen. Ann Rest (D-New Hope) and lawyer-legislator Rep. Steve Simon (D-Hopkins). The bill has been scheduled for a hearing in the House Elections Committee on Tuesday next week. If the legislature passes the bill, the issue would be put to the voters in the form of a ballot question, as the reforms would require changing the Minnesota Constitution.
Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2013/03/11/judicial-retention-election-bill-introduced/
Mayor Luke Ravenstahl says police Detective Frank Rende should lose his job over his conduct captured on video during St. Patrick's Day celebrations Saturday on the South Side -- even if the detective did not turn on his Taser, as some initially claimed he did in Internet postings.
"My first glance at the video, it is very disturbing. It is something that in my mind shouldn't have happened," Ravenstahl said. "And somebody better give me a real good reason why he shouldn't be fired. It's just unacceptable and that's not the way police should be acting."
So he didn't tase Keyser. He didn't kill Keyser. Keyser wasn't injured. Though this may be true, this is not an endorsement of Rende's qualifications to wear a shield and gun.
The likelihood of Rende being fired in slim to none, of course. Even if the police chief were to follow the mayor's lead, Rende's conduct barely scratches the surface of things a cop can do that can't be excused. Not only will he end up back in uniform, but with a backpay award as well.
But wait, you say? No police union official can endorse conduct like this, reprehensible despite the fortuitous fact that the taser didn't fire, you say? Well, you underestimate the ability of the police union to rationalize the conduct of its members.
The Pittsburgh Police Bureau now says it has determined that Rende's Taser was not activated. Union attorney Bryan Campbell criticized the mayor's comments, saying, "I really think he should have withheld his opinion as to whether or not this employee should be terminated until after he knew all the facts."
This one was a no-brainer, no harm, no foul. It doesn't matter what Rende said (which was atrocious), or what he intended to do. Without blood and guts, he's just another good cop doing his job.
But then Campbell goes to the trusty fallback argument on the police union talking points:
A lot of facts. A lot of things. This requires a massive investigation, the sort that never applies to anyone other than a cop accused of doing wrong. Particularly when that wrong is captured on video, which can't be trusted when it fails to show the justification for the cops outrageous behavior. It's great evidence, on the other hand, when it shows the crime committed by anyone else. That's just how video works."I'm not an expert in procedures and policies, but I can tell you that I'm sure they were all violated in that case," Ravenstahl said. "To have an officer, you know, literally chase down the individual and use force like he did is something that just will not be tolerated."
Campbell disagrees. "This is a rush to judgment, that all the facts were not established," he said. "There were a lot of facts and a lot of things that took place before that video that he viewed started."
Source: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2013/03/21/mayor-luke-ravenstahl-gets-it-right.aspx?ref=rss
power of attorney power of attorny private attorney private lawyer pro bono lawyers
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/07/nsstas-take-the-hill/
Most folks know there are cameras EVERYWHERE. The US is becoming more like the UK this way with each passing day. Apparently this Florida woman is not aware of the phenomenon. Per the Charlotte County Sheriff's Office:
A Charlotte County Sheriff's deputy arrested a Port Charlotte Target employee Tuesday after security went back through surveillance video that showed her steal cash from her register 14 times totaling $2,300. Arrested for Grand Theft was Melissa A. Sayre, 29, 11798 Van Loon Avenue, Englewood East.14 times!
Target security began checking archived surveillance video after Sayre’s cash register came up short starting Feb. 7 and continuing until Mar. 15. Sayre was called to the Target Offices to discuss the shortages; she admitted that she stole the money and was immediately terminated. The deputy arrived and arrested Sayer who said she took the money out of need to pay her rent and fix her car.Here's a link to the story, which includes a mug shot.
Source: http://rss.justia.com/~r/LegalJuiceCom/~3/jRDNRjbGvWQ/post_626.html
Not to be outdone by the humorous recollections of colleague Clifford Weckstein, Roanoke Circuit Judge Jonathan Apgar worked in a good story in a recent interview for the Roanoke Bar Review.
As related by Michael P. Gardner, Apgar began serving as a substitute general district judge in 1990:
He recalled being challenged by the work, and by the logistics of traveling to various courts as a first-time substitute. On one occasion, when substituting in a rural court, Judge Apgar underestimated his travel time. When he arrived, he asked the clerk if he was in the right place for General District Court. The clerk replied that he was, and that they would get started “as soon as the damn substitute judge arrived.”
Source: http://valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2013/03/15/a-case-of-misjudgment/
legal advice online legal aid legal aid eugene oregon legal aid society legal counsel
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/un-billable-hour/2012/02/how-law-firms-can-track-time/
lawyer office lawyers legal legal advice legal advice online
legal aid eugene oregon legal aid society legal counsel legal help legal information
While filings at the trial level of federal courts declined in the last fiscal year, appellate cases were on the uptick, according to the latest data submitted by federal court officials to the U.S. Judicial Conference.
The data covers the 12-month period that ended Sept. 30, 2012.
At the district court level, while the total number of filings in all cases fell 5 percent to 372,563, criminal filings fell 9 percent to 94,121 in fiscal 2012 after reaching a record high in 2011. Civil filings dropped 4 percent to 278,442.
There was a 14 percent drop in the number of bankruptcy petitions filed in fiscal 2013, bringing the total to 1,261,140. The number of non-business bankruptcy petitions dropped by 14 percent, while business-related petitions fell 16 percent. Chapter 7 filings fell 16 percent, Chapter 11 filings fell by 12 percent and 10 percent fewer petitions were filed under Chapter 13.
While there were 132,340 people under post-conviction supervision last year, a 2-percent increase over the year before, cases opened in the pretrial services system fell 4 percent to 109,242.
Though filings in federal appellate courts rose 4 percent overall, that increase was not driven by appeals in civil cases, which fell by 1 percent. Criminal appeals rose 12 percent last fiscal year, appeals of administrative agency decisions increased by 11 percent and bankruptcy appeals rose 19 percent.
- Kimberly Atkins, LawyersUSA
Source: http://valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2013/03/22/federal-court-complaints-drop-while-appeals-rise/
free lawyer consultation free lawyer consultation california